1. The reading implies that tactical media does not make an obvious, definitive point but rather is left to be interpreted by observers. If the project should be open-ended, how does a tactical media artist be sure the intended message is communicated and it is not perceived the wrong way?
2. The introduction to this book talks mostly about tactical media as it pertains to war and politics, but what other messages could be portrayed through this form of art and communication?
No comments:
Post a Comment